Archive for the ‘California Real Estate’ Category

Everett mortgage: Academic has no ethics but that is typical

Monday, November 30th, 2009

An Ivory Tower professor has no concept of ethics

Brent T White an Arizona law school professor has some disturbing things to say about California real estate and homes for sale Everett. He says to walk away from your home if you are underwater with your mortgage. He says go ahead and break the chains of guilt, shame and fear and simply walk away. No matter the ethics involved, no matter any morally just walk away.

First off he suggests that you would save hundreds of thousands of dollars doing this. He sites facts and figures that distort the problem. On page 8 of the abstract he claims that 51% of all home owners in Arizona are underwater. He also claims that 32% nationwide are underwater. But my research shows his numbers are a bit exaggerated but that is beside the point. The California real estate market has seen ups and downs. The same can be said for homes for sale in Everett. Both markets have gone up and down many times in the last 30 years.

Professor White claims that these home owners have no hope of ever recovering their equity. He thinks that the market will never recover and they will simply be paying forever. He seems to think that this market correction is the first of its kind and has no precedent. He claims that your credit score will take a hit but will recover to acceptable levels within 2 years. He claims that if you stay current with everything else you can get a decent score back within 2 years. By acceptable levels he means a 660 score or better.

This ethically challenged professor has a few other claims. In some states such as California and Arizona so called anti-deficiency states lenders can’t go after defaulting borrowers. That isn’t completely true. Also that in other states lenders will simply not pursue borrowers because its not worth it. I have heard that some borrowers will hire attorneys to see if some flaw can be found in the contract to make the mortgage invalid and therefore not enforceable. This can become as expensive as simply paying the mortgage.  White’s main point is that borrowers let emotions and ethics get in the way of clear financial thinking. To Whites way of thinking a contract is not deal if it doesn’t work out for the borrower. He thinks the bank should get stuck with the debt and the borrower let off the hook with no liability beyond a credit ding. White claims that there is an inherent imbalance in the relationship between the bank and the borrower.

Let’s examine his ideas and extend them out into the future. First Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dispute Whites claims that your credit will recover in 2 years. In my experience a foreclosure will haunt you for at least 5 years unless there are extenuating circumstances. You had better be able to document those circumstances. And expect a rough road to obtain another mortgage within the next 2-5 years. Borrowers who simply walk away will face severely reduced credit scores for at least 5 years. And beyond the moral dimensions if many people actually start to do this think of the effects on future borrowers. Mortgages are already getting hard to get. Now if walking away happened on a large scale they will become extremely hard to get and much more expensive. Interest rates reflect the risk involved in full repayment. I consider Whites position completely lacking in ethical and moral standing. This is exactly what I expect to hear from a left wing nut from Academia. I came across this same point of view in a blog from a financial advisor also from Phoenix. He and I had quite a flame out going via email. I said the same to him as I do here. This stance is completely without merit.  The bank made this loan to the borrower expecting repayment. The bank didn’t ask you for any of your expected profit. And when you made that mortgage you expected to make a profit. The bank didn’t make the rules that created this mortgage crisis. Banks on a different level do have some responsibility for the mortgage bubble. But the real responsibility lies with the federal government.

What are your thoughts on this? I welcome all comments below.

Jim Johnson

Everett mortgage: 5 Things to look for when buying your first Home

Monday, November 30th, 2009

The smart way to use your VA mortgage or your FHA mortgage

These ideas work for California real estate and Everett real estate. Before we even start looking for homes for sale Everett I will assume you have done what I call the 3 basic tasks you need to do before buying your first home.

  1. You have found a good loan officer and have qualified for a VA or FHA mortgage. The reason I suggest a VA mortgage is because it is the only true zero down mortgage available without heavy restrictions. Now if you don’t qualify for the VA mortgage you should be able to qualify for a FHA mortgage. The FHA mortgage has the lowest down payment (3.5% of the purchase price) and is the easy to qualify for.
  2. Next before anything else I suggest you see a qualified tax professional. The reason I suggest this is because if you have never owned a home before you will be surprised at the tax benefits of home ownership. Tax planning is always best done before the act not after.
  3. Find a good real estate agent. Be sure that the agent knows the area you are considering.

1) Ask you agent to look for a neighborhood in transition. Usually your best bargains for a home for sale in Everett are in neighborhoods in transition. Now what exactly is a neighborhood in transition? The first thing is how many of the homes look to be rental as opposed to owner occupied? If you really want to know that here is a simple way. Have your agent ask a title insurance company for an area report of owner occupied vs. non owner occupied homes. In the report they will have dates of sales recordings. This way you can get a feel for the way the neighborhood is going.

2) Next really look at the homes in the area. Look for well kept yards, signs of home remodeling, new paint, new roofs, etc. Does the neighborhood have CCR’s? CCR’s are codes, covenants and restrictions. In Everett there is the historic area. In this area you have to maintain your home in certain ways. In an larger area developed by a single developer you will usually find CCR’s. These can be minor to major restrictions. If you are buying a Condo there are ALWAYS CCR’s.

3) Another source of information is the local police records. These records can show which way crime is going. Usually owner occupied homes will have a lower crime rate than rentals, for obvious reasons. Look for bars on windows and doors.

4) Just because a home for sale in Everett isn’t listed doesn’t mean you can’t buy it. When I go shopping for real estate bargains I look for homes owned by very long term owners. Retired people who may be snowbirds or simply not able to keep a home up anymore just might be open to an offer.

5) How about expired listings, there are plenty in California real estate. In this market many homes haven’t sold for various reasons. Here is when you can find so interesting bargains. Here is when creative financing can occur. If the seller is wiling you can actually buy a home without a formal loan. I don’t recommend this unless you have the help of someone experienced in this. This is true sweat equity. This is the way I bought my very first home in West Lynn OR. I bought it then fixed it up and got formal financing later.

You are allowed only one VA mortgage at a time. The same is true with an FHA mortgage. Use them wisely and they will make you a lot of money.

Comment and suggestions are most welcome.

Jim Johnson

California Foreclosures Push Property Values Lower Nationwide

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Distressed Property Pushes Value Lower Everywhere

It simply stands to reason that distressed property sold at public auction would push California real estate prices lower. It will also have a negative effect in mortgage interest rates. Because more and more foreclosed properties are showing up this really is affecting values nationwide.

Now when the banks start unloading their “Shadow Inventory” we will really have problems. Right now it is estimated that 600,000 to 800,000 homes that have been foreclosed by banks are not on the market yet. These homes are called REO property. REO means Real Estate Owned by a bank or other financial institution.

Every single home buyer who finances their purchase needs an appraisal. The lender requires it and a wise consumer will demand it. Most foreclosed homes are sold as is without appraisal. Most will not allow an interior inspection of the home.

Now any reasonable home buyer can tell a distressed home from a well maintained home just by looking at it. But if a buyer can’t look at or inspect a home before buying he will not offer a reasonable price. So what happens is a lowball offer. This lowball offer affects all the surrounding homes in a several ways.

  • First if I want to sell I am competing with lowball offers for homes no one has inspected nor appraised. That is simply not fair. It depresses my homes value and takes my equity. It might even go far enough to prevent my sale.
  • If I am a distressed home owner myself and need to refinance it might depress my homes value and prevent me from saving my home from foreclosure. This makes for more foreclosures further depressing the market.
  • If I am trying to refinance simply to take advantage of historically low interest rates I cann’t do it because this robs me of my equity needed for the refinance.

Right now builders, consumer advocates and outraged home owners are asking what can be done?

If this practice isn’t changed it will continue a downward spiral in values across the nation. Because California real estate is such a huge market it has a disproportionate effect on other markets.

It has been suggested that appraisers be allowed to consider if a home is distressed and then allow them to expand the distance between sales and  / or expand the time frame used for comparative sales. This would allow some compensating factors into the appraisal.  Because it isn’t fair to require any seller to allow walk thoughs of their property this expansion would allow more factors to be included into appraisals. Thus mitigating the foreclosures effects.

Given how this affects California real estate I think these are good ideas. What do you think? Please comment below.

Jim Johnson