Archive for the ‘Mortgage Fraud’ Category

Everett mortgage: 5 Things to look for when buying your first Home

Monday, November 30th, 2009

The smart way to use your VA mortgage or your FHA mortgage

These ideas work for California real estate and Everett real estate. Before we even start looking for homes for sale Everett I will assume you have done what I call the 3 basic tasks you need to do before buying your first home.

  1. You have found a good loan officer and have qualified for a VA or FHA mortgage. The reason I suggest a VA mortgage is because it is the only true zero down mortgage available without heavy restrictions. Now if you don’t qualify for the VA mortgage you should be able to qualify for a FHA mortgage. The FHA mortgage has the lowest down payment (3.5% of the purchase price) and is the easy to qualify for.
  2. Next before anything else I suggest you see a qualified tax professional. The reason I suggest this is because if you have never owned a home before you will be surprised at the tax benefits of home ownership. Tax planning is always best done before the act not after.
  3. Find a good real estate agent. Be sure that the agent knows the area you are considering.

1) Ask you agent to look for a neighborhood in transition. Usually your best bargains for a home for sale in Everett are in neighborhoods in transition. Now what exactly is a neighborhood in transition? The first thing is how many of the homes look to be rental as opposed to owner occupied? If you really want to know that here is a simple way. Have your agent ask a title insurance company for an area report of owner occupied vs. non owner occupied homes. In the report they will have dates of sales recordings. This way you can get a feel for the way the neighborhood is going.

2) Next really look at the homes in the area. Look for well kept yards, signs of home remodeling, new paint, new roofs, etc. Does the neighborhood have CCR’s? CCR’s are codes, covenants and restrictions. In Everett there is the historic area. In this area you have to maintain your home in certain ways. In an larger area developed by a single developer you will usually find CCR’s. These can be minor to major restrictions. If you are buying a Condo there are ALWAYS CCR’s.

3) Another source of information is the local police records. These records can show which way crime is going. Usually owner occupied homes will have a lower crime rate than rentals, for obvious reasons. Look for bars on windows and doors.

4) Just because a home for sale in Everett isn’t listed doesn’t mean you can’t buy it. When I go shopping for real estate bargains I look for homes owned by very long term owners. Retired people who may be snowbirds or simply not able to keep a home up anymore just might be open to an offer.

5) How about expired listings, there are plenty in California real estate. In this market many homes haven’t sold for various reasons. Here is when you can find so interesting bargains. Here is when creative financing can occur. If the seller is wiling you can actually buy a home without a formal loan. I don’t recommend this unless you have the help of someone experienced in this. This is true sweat equity. This is the way I bought my very first home in West Lynn OR. I bought it then fixed it up and got formal financing later.

You are allowed only one VA mortgage at a time. The same is true with an FHA mortgage. Use them wisely and they will make you a lot of money.

Comment and suggestions are most welcome.

Jim Johnson

Homes for sale in Everett generate fradulent claims

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Imagine a Government Program Invites Fraud

Keep in mind even if you have a home for sale in Everett this type of fraud doesn’t affect you. Before we get into the meat of this article lets remember Medicare, Medicaid and workers compensation fraud. Just a quick Google search reveals that between the three there is fraud in excess of $120 Billion dollars. I’ll just bet the “Cash for Clunkers” was rife with fraud. Just think about the fraud and waste a multi BILLION dollar health care bureaucracy will generate.

Since the first time home buyer credit was enhanced and extended the feds seem to think the fraud is at acceptable levels. I have been told that 582 children have filed for and been paid the full $8000 credit.

It’s disheartening that problems would surface in the one plan that is housing’s primary driver, but I guess the fraud disclosure should not come as a surprise. Mortgage scams have been in the news. And we are just now getting an indication of how many consumers are willing to participate — especially if they think there is a chance the Internal Revenue Service will not discover their creative maneuvers.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration after reviewing their  audit procedures was able to determine that IRS didn’t have effective controls in place to detect fraud in the program.   It developed computer programs to identify 73,799 buyer credits attached to returns totaling almost $504 million that were claimed by taxpayers who had indications of prior home ownership within three years. This is a no- no under the old rules.

The original rules for claiming the first time home buyer credit defined a first time buyer as one who hadn’t had home ownership in the previous three years. According to the audit, the 73,799 taxpayers had entered information on their individual income tax returns for one of the prior three years indicating they may have owned a home. These entries included deductions for home mortgage interest, real estate taxes, deductible points, and qualified mortgage insurance premiums.

IRS had no significant controls in place to check on eligibility for the credit.    There were no controls to identify many questionable claims for the credit, many key controls were missing, according to the inspector. Missing from the suggested safeguards was information provided on the form to verify eligibility requirements. In addition, taxpayers were not required to provide documentation that they actually purchased a home. The new extended credit includes proof of purchase.

According to the audit summary, IRS auditors identified 19,351 tax year 2008 electronically filed tax returns on which taxpayers claimed credits totaling over $139 million for homes that had not yet been purchased. It was during these audits that several 4 year old “taxpayers” were identified.

“Through July 25, 2009, we identified 582 taxpayers under 18 years of age who claimed almost $4 million in first-time homebuyer credits. A child under the age of 18 cannot sign a binding contract. The contract is unenforceable and therefore worthless.

Approximately 28 percent of the 582 taxpayers under age 18 that were identified did not meet the IRS income screening criteria. In 64 of these cases, other IRS filters flagged the claim for further scrutiny. However, 101 of the claims (totaling $626,779) made by children under the age of 18 did not meet any of the IRS screening criteria.

According to the audit, the IRS believed that its filters identifying taxpayers claiming the credit who had adjusted gross Incomes below certain levels would catch the questionable claims.  Until the audit the controls for income levels were not adequate.

While many taxpayers will be identified by recently implemented IRS filters and are subject to pre-refund audits, the inspectors identified 70,005 taxpayers whose tax returns were processed prior to the implementation of the filters.

Clearly, the IRS underestimated the need for basic first-time homebuyer safeguards in the credit program — and probably the popularity of the program itself.

Now it will get another chance to redeem itself. The first-time buyer program has been extended until April 30. Buyers who make a deal by then will have until June 30 to close and received the $8,000 credit. The program was also expanded to include people who have owned a home for five years and are buying a new one. They have the same deadlines and will qualify for a $6,500 credit. Some of the original tax returns that were fraudulent now qualify for the credit. So some cheats will still keep the money. Now that is luck.

So now if you have a home for sale in Everett you just might qualify for the new $6500 credit.

Homes for Sale Everett Mortgage

Saturday, November 7th, 2009

New First Time Home Buyer Credit signed into Law Today

The President has signed this bill today November 7, 2009. This is now law. This bill will impact how homes for sale in Everett are marketed. Because prices are so low I think some sellers will increase their prices by the amount of the credit, maybe even more. If I had a home for sale in Everett I would probably up the price by $10,000 just because. Because the credit is refundable and will almost cover the entire down payment for a home priced up to $250,000. If you go with an FHA mortgage you only need 3.5% down. Working backwards you find that if the home costs less than $228,571.43 I actually get in for ZERO down. Smart sellers will see that and up their prices.  To smart buyers this also means I can cover most or at least ½ of the down payment up to about $450,000. Whether this promotes sales for just hurries a sale that would have taken place remains to be seen. What our economy really needs are jobs.

Here is how the new bill will work and effect homes for sale Everett. The new rules will take effect today November 7, 2009.

1)     The first time buyer’s credit will stay at 10% of purchase price with a max of $8000. This is a refundable credit which means you get if even if you paid no taxes. By the way 41% of all workers don’t pay federal income taxes.

2)     The definition of a first time buyer is no principle home ownership in last 3 years.

3)     If you are a current home owner and are buying another principle residence you can qualify for up to $6500 in a new credit.

4)     The definition of a current home owner is having lived in a principle residence for 5 consecutive years out of the last

5)     The credit is extended to all purchases signed by April 30, 2010. The deal must close by July 1, 2010.

6)     Income limits are increased to $125,000 single and $225,000 married.

7)     Cost of home no more than $800,000. Thought how you can afford an $800,000 home on $125,000 per year is beyond me.

8)     To cut down on fraud you must attach a copy of the closing document (HUD-1) to you tax return.

Knowledge of the provisions of this new law can help if you have a home for sale Everett. Because a FSBO usually doesn’t have a realtor behind them they really need to know this stuff.

Just a couple of comments aside here. This has only tangential value but it illustrates what the government is doing to the American economy and the real estate industry in particular. Just like the tax credit here HVCC was designed with the highest intentions. But the law of unintended consequences has taken hold. I wonder what will happen because of this credit .

1)     HVCC was created to cut down fraud. HVCC means Home Valuation Code of Conduct and applies to how appraisals are done. This really has crippled the real estate business. It has consistently brought in low ball values on homes. This has crippled the refinance business just when we need the ability to refinance ARM’s that are going thru the roof. This forces homes into foreclosure when they didn’t have to go. I have a blog post on HVCC on my web site.

2)     HVCC was designed to stop fraud but it hasn’t. Fraud is up almost 50% over the same month one year ago.

3)     HVCC has killed the conventional mortgage business. Almost all loans are FHA mortgages or VA mortgages. This is because they don’t have to use the HVCC guidelines.

Anyone who thinks the government can help is blind to these facts. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Andrew Cuomo are responsible for this fiasco. So far almost everything the government has done has hurt the consumer. Why doesn’t that surprise me?

Some FAQ’s for the new First Time Buyers Credit law sign today.

Q: Must the new home cost more than the old one.

A: No, So a current home owner can sell down and still qualify for the $6500 credit.

Q: I am a first time buyer but made more money than the “old” credit allowed. My contract will close November 20, 2009. My income now qualifies can I get the credit?

A: Yes. The new law is retroactive with all facets of the law now signed.

Q: I owned a home for 10 years and lived there the whole time. I sold it 2 years ago and have rented since. If I buy can I qualify for the new $6500 credit?

A: Yes if your income qualifies. Also you stated that you had lived in the home at least 5 consecutive years out of the last

If you have a home for sale Everett or you are a FSBO take note that this law should help you. I hope this answers most simple questions.

Everett mortgage: Countrywide Mortgage Fraud

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Countrywide CEO finally going to face the music for mortgage fraud

And it is about time. All I can say is YAAAAAAAAA. This guy should be in jail forever. As you read this keep in mind what he did. While all this was happening he went and hired a bunch of people claiming that all the bad was behind Countrywide. That was so the stock wouldn’t tank. All the while he was selling his stock so he could cash in while the price was good. This was insider trading at its worse.

* Mozilo sought to dismiss fraud, insider trading case

* Case also continues against ex-Countrywide COO, CFO

* Judge: Countrywide’s poor underwriting could be material

NEW YORK/LOS ANGELES, Nov 4 (Reuters) – A federal judge rejected a request by Angelo Mozilo, the former chief executive of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp, to dismiss a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit accusing him of securities fraud and insider trading.

In a Tuesday court filing, U.S. District Judge John Walter in Los Angeles also rejected requests by David Sambol and Eric Sieracki, respectively Countrywide’s former chief operating officer and former chief financial officer, to dismiss related SEC fraud charges.

Countrywide had been the largest U.S. mortgage lender before liquidity dried up in summer of 2007, leading to its acquisition the following year by Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) for $2.5 billion.

Mozilo’s lawyer David Siegel did not immediately return a call for comment. Walter Brown, who represents Sambol, declined to comment. Nicolas Morgan, who represents Sieracki, also did not immediately return a call.

The SEC sued the defendants in June, accusing them of misleading investors about the quality of Countrywide’s loans, including tens of billions of dollars of risky subprime and adjustable-rate mortgages.

“The specific allegations of the complaint relied on by the SEC describe in great detail the virtual abandonment of prudent underwriting guidelines and the resulting proliferation of poor quality loans, during the same period Countrywide was touting the superior quality of its underwriting guidelines and its loan portfolio,” the judge wrote.

“Moreover, given that Countrywide’s core business, i.e., selling mortgages into the secondary market, admittedly depended upon the quality of its loan production, it is certainly not difficult for the court to conclude that the poor quality of Countrywide’s underwriting practices and loan portfolio would be material to investors,” he added.

The insider trading charge concerned Mozilo’s alleged exercise in 2006 and 2007 of more than 5.1 million stock options and sale of the resulting shares, leading to more than $139 million of profit.

According to the complaint, Mozilo set up the plan shortly after admitting in an email to colleagues that Countrywide was “flying blind” as to the quality of its loans.

Mozilo, 70, is perhaps the most prominent executive charged by U.S. regulators with wrongdoing in connection with the housing market collapse.

The case is SEC v. Mozilo, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 09-3994. (Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

There are more articles about Everett mortgages below.

As Featured on ArticleCity.com